Shortly after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis on Wednesday, city leaders began looking into whether the officer had violated state criminal law.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said, “We collectively are going to do everything possible to get to the bottom of this, to get justice, and to make sure that there is an investigation that is conducted in full.” Police Chief Brian O’Hara followed up by saying that the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension is “investigat[ing] whether any state laws within the state of Minnesota have been violated.”

If they conclude that state law has been violated, the question is: What next? Contrary to recent assertions from some federal officials, states can prosecute federal officers for violating state criminal laws, and there is precedent for that.

  • Carmakazi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    9 days ago

    Even in the bizarro world where an arrest warrant or indictment is issued, ICE will close ranks around their brother who just got a notch on his belt. No state cops are gonna slug it out with the feds to make that arrest.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      9 days ago

      Although you’re probably right, part of me really hopes that’s why Walz put the national guard on standby

      • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s the stated reason that Walz put the national guard on standby. He said he put them on standby and that he wants ice out of our state; the implication there being that ice can leave on their own or be escorted out. He’s not running for reelection so he has no reason to hold back anymore. I have never seen him quite that clipped in a press release before. He is furious. We may have ice being forcibly deported by the MN national guard shortly here and that is going to get very interesting in a lot of ways

        • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I watched his speech and he doesn’t actually say that he is putting them on standby to defend against ICE. Reading between the lines, he seems to be putting them on standby to be ready to quell protest so that Trump can’t use the protests as an excuse to put federal troops in the area.

          • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            9 days ago

            What I got from the speech is the following in fairly quick sucession.

            1. We won’t have minnesotans fighting minnesotans.
            2. The minnesota national guard are minnesotans; they are your friends and neighbors.
            3. The minnesota national guard has been put on standby.
            4. Ice is not wanted in minnesota and they need to leave.

            The fact that points 1 and 2 were said right next to each other says to me at least that the national guard isn’t there for the protesters.

            • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 days ago

              What made me think that is that he rattles off a whole list of state agencies that were being activated to deal with the incident, and then his next words are we do not need help from the federal government.

              Quell the protest was probably the wrong wording. But I think that the national guard is being used to ensure that the protests are controlled and don’t escalate or turn to violence which would give the federal government an excuse to send troops…

              • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 days ago

                A lot of those same agencies are also the same agencies you’d activate if you were getting ready to boot out ice too though. I guess only time will tell exactly what is going to happen. But Walz did seem like he regretted and learned from his response to the George Floyd protests. It seems likely to me that he may swing the other way this time.

              • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                …and then his next words are we do not need help from the federal government.

                And what are ICE agents? I haven’t seen the interview, and your interpretation could well be correct, but it could as easily be, “We’ve had enough of federal agents entering our state and arresting and killing our citizens without warrants or due process.” Frankly, no state needs that kind of help. We will see.

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 days ago

          He’s not running for reelection so he has no reason to hold back anymore.

          i am not even an american, but i’d really like to live in a world where running for reelection would be the reason not to hold back.

          • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah, running for office they need to seem bland enough to appeal to the most people. It’s kind of a shitty system when you only see their true colors after they are done campaigning. Although, Walz at least has always been pretty transparent in that regard. He’s always just been a small town highschool coach. He’s not a political creature.

            I wish we could keep him in office. But in a way I am also glad he’s getting out of politics because especially these past several years it has been clear how hard the job is on him. Him getting out of politics is going to be bad for us but good for him because he is a good person. Asking him to run again would feel like kicking a puppy. He’s the only politician where I’ve ever felt like I needed to apologize to them for voting for them.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          Hey just gonna point out that the civil war nearly started some years early due to slave hunters kidnapping folks in Northern states. The only reason that didn’t happen was largely due to luck and folks taking matters into their own hands to off slave hunters. I say this to make the point that this whole situation with ICE ain’t that far off.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    9 days ago

    Could means fuck all. The word that needs to be used is will.
    “Minnesota WILL prosecute the ice shooter.”
    When that is the title of an article then it means something. Until then it’s all may, might, and could. Weak shit.

    The Gestapo is murdering people on the street. Public executions on the streets of the Nazied States of America.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yeah sure.

    How many National Guard went to jail for the Kent State massacre?

    Zero. Four murdered, 9 maimed.

  • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    They could. But they won’t. That would be more than just token resistance. Everybody knows the Dems are paid by corporations to only resist with words, motions, committees, and meaningless votes.

    If we want accountability, we’re going to have to demand it, like after George Floyd.

    Only once it becomes cheaper to appease us than resist us, will we be appeased.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        If you think we got to this point only because of Republicans… You haven’t been paying attention.

        No they’re not the same exactly, but democratic inaction is nearly as bad as it allows this kind of shit to happen.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Blaming the voters for rightly seeing the dems won’t fight for them either isn’t helping the situation.

            We wouldn’t be in this mess if the democratic party hadn’t made excuse after excuse. We’ve been betrayed over and over and that takes its toll on people.

            I still hold my nose and vote D because they’re the lesser of two evils clearly, but I can understand why so many are tuned out.

            • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              Did you know Democrats originally tried to make single payer a part of ACA?

              The problem is, they needed 60 votes in the Senate, and ONE Democrat, Joe Lieberman, joined EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN in voting against the public option.

              1 single Republican voter crossing the aisle could have delivered single payer, but idiots blame the Dems. Electing 1 more Democrat instead of a Republican could have delivered single payer, but idiots blame the Dems. 40 Republicans and 1 Democrat voted NO against Single Payer, and brilliant minds everywhere gargled BOTH SIDES SAME!! You can’t make this shit up.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I did, the funny part is instead they literally went with Romney’s plan and still got shit on forever for it.

                Trying to reason and play politics with facists doesn’t work, and its long past time they learn that.

                Did you know the Democrats actively prop up republican nutjobs (financially supporting their campaigns) because they think it’s easier to win against them? One of those nutjobs was Donald Trump.

                You can’t make this shit up

      • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If voting R means corporatism and fascism, and voting D still means corporatism and fascism, just on the next election cycle instead of this one, who cares if there’s any technical distinction between them?

          • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Citizens don’t get meaningful reform against face shooting or accountability for face shooters under D either.

            The best we ever get is another public condemnation against face shooting and an empty threat to hold the next face shooter accountable, pinky swear this time.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 days ago

    Look what it took to get Chauvin prosecuted. If we want pigs to face justice, we have to speak at a volume they can hear us in their mansions.

    • Cruel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      9 days ago

      Chauvin wasn’t assaulted with what’s legally considered a dangerous weapon. So this case would be much harder. Unprecedented, really.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        9 days ago

        Chauvin wasn’t assaulted

        That’s not what he claimed at the time. A big part of every cop-killer story is the allegation that the person they murdered prompted the killing. Chauvin insisted through his entire defense that Floyd lashed out at him in his final moments, right before he spontaneously died of a drug induced heart attack.

        We’ve got video clear as day of the ICE agent casually walking up to the car and plugging the woman in the face. This was a mother who’d just dropped her child off at daycare, not some marauding vehicular anti-ICE assassin. She was given seconds to respond to a command and butchered for failing to act fast enough.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        By the logic the government has tried to push on this murder, people should be able to shoot into the vehicles of ICE thugs when they try to drive through protest crowds. We’ve seen that on video plenty of times in the last year.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not an american but seems like US’ case law is very much precedented here. I don’t have a source at hand but there has been at least a dozen similar cases all sided with the victims. Even official training of ICE explicitly says “do not stand in front of the vehicle ever”.

        If there’s no justice here then it’s entirely on lack of will rather than law.

        • Cruel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          Every case people cite are civil lawsuits for excessive force. And people usually don’t prevail, especially when an officer is actually in the process of being assaulted.

          At most, her family could get a settlement for damages for excessive force. But criminal charges are what would be pretty unprecedented.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            I think it’s moot to discuss this without bringing up the actual law cases and I’m not going to lie - I’m a bit too lazy and this is too depressing for me to sacrifice my time for.

            My faith in US’ justice system is not great though so you might very well be right.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I hope that you never find yourself opposite an asshole cop who doesn’t care whether you actually pose any danger to them.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Should”. Whatever this is just an article nothing is going to happen. Also I don’t really think prosecuting one officer is enough

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      The FBI is taking over the case and as such MN state prosecutors cannot access any evidence. I don’t know if they can prosecute a case based on just the videos taken from bystanders, but typically there’s a lot more to a legal case.

      If the FBI takes over the investigation it will land on the desks of podcasters and grifters who have already gone all-in to protect their bosses from being investigated for raping children, so I don’t think we’re going to see anything satisfying happen here.

      I don’t know how many innocent people have to die or what skin color they need to have before people will broadly start to seriously think about regime change on our terms.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      “Should” typically means “must” in the legal sense.

      But also consider that getting ICE to leave their agent out to dry would would go a ways in breaking their sense of invulnerability. Same dynamic as getting a police union to dump a cop in the courts.

      • LogicalFallacy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s why the mayor and government should arrest first and ask questions later. The guy is clearly a flight risk, armed, and dangerous. Likely has a criminal record as well.

    • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Trump keeps getting away with shit on the federal level because no one is stopping him and people comply with his demands. Despite Trump repeatedly “pardoning” Tina Peters, the prison guards in Colorado are keeping her locked up and are ignoring him. Minnesota could do the same

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      He’s most likely being put up in a hotel with his family and hidden from public while the administration hires the biggest legal team they can and they’ve probably already started shopping for boats for Clarence Thomas ahead of time in case it heads to the Supreme Court.

      It’s absolutely maddening because as you browse the internet broadly, there are still people who either looked at the video and “still can’t decide what happened” or have refused to watch it and are open that they haven’t watched and won’t watch it, yet are still going to bat for a brute squad who would put a bullet in their heads just as easily as anyone else.

      A lot of people have zero interest still, and it wasn’t always like this. If this kind of thing had happened in the 90’s, it would be a national incident that would have led to entire cities being shut down for civil disobedience and rioting. Something is harming all of our minds, something happened to our country on a deeper level than just the creeping tentacles of fascism, something is harming our very being and sense of agency and it’s highly disturbing.

      The only reason we have our country being taken away by a dictator who wants to go to war with europe and dispose of his opposition is because broadly most people just don’t give a fuck about anything. You see it here in places like Lemmy with younger people who are utterly cynical and discourage activism or even hoping for a better future. You see it in exit-polling from the last federal election which despite having the highest voter turnout percentage in history, most people broadly had no idea who to vote for or who represented what. You see it when you try to order a hamburger and the 22-year-old cashier stares straight ahead looking tuned-out or confused. You see it on late-night comedy television where the audience just laughs on command at “jokes” about how France is preparing to fight a war with the US.

      We’re all gonna die if you guys don’t put down the phones and tablets and keyboards and start talking to each other face-to-face. Your brains are being rotted out of your skulls and nobody is DOING anything about it. We’re going to lose EVERYTHING.

      • Contextual Idiot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        You’re wrong about about what’s causing the apathy and disinterest. It’s not being caused by phones and tablets, social media addiction, or doomscrolling. Those are symptoms of the real problem.

        That 22 year old cashier is zoning out because that’s their 2nd or 3rd job, and they’re exhausted. Those folks who refuse to watch the video? Some of them simply can’t, because they’re burnt out from just trying to survive. Those cynical kids with no hope for the future? After 2 recessions and a pandemic, that’s kept them out of the jobs market, I can’t blame them.

        A lot of people are struggling to survive. Struggling to ensure they can keep a roof over their head, struggling to afford groceries, struggling to afford that car they need to get to the 2 or 3 jobs they work.

        The cost of living is ridiculous now, and wages are stagnant. A large amount of people are simply surviving. All their energy is going to getting their basic needs met, and not all are able to meet those needs. They can’t spare the attention to care about the rest of the world, when they are worrying about which bill to pay and which can wait. Or how to keep that car running just a bit longer until they can get it fixed.

        Trump and his goons are absolutely taking advantage of this too. Don’t fight back, or we’ll make things worse. Argue with us and we’ll take away that benefit you’re using to survive. So you’re absolutely right when you say something has to be done. And the sooner, the better. But understand that for those folks we are talking about, they won’t be able to help. Not yet. Unfortunately, things will have to get worse before they are forced to act. And not “ICE is killing more people” worse. It’ll be “I’m getting evicted, I can barely afford to eat, and a lot of people I know are the same.”

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I will agree that the system is now a cycle, that it’s now self-sustaining apathy that breeds exploitation that breeds apathy, etc. It’s a downward spiral, but I will not budge that our dead internet of mindless dopamine hits isn’t a strong link in that chain of despair or a major factor in people’s lack of willingness to organize to actually address those problems that are making people want to escape reality. To say nothing of what it’s done to our atomized perspectives and inability to agree on a shared world anymore.

          But that aside, the crux of what I’m talking about is community. In other times, we were much better as a species and society at creating community that reinforces both the laws of the land and provides us with opportunities to either change the system or to reinforce it and help each other. Whether or not you think that doomscrolling is responsible or not for the conditions we’re in, it’s absolutely keeping us divided and isolated and alone. We are a species wired to have face-to-face socialization and it’s on the decline. Rates of young relationships are dropping like a rock, birth rates are dropping, people don’t go out and hang out and enjoy being around each other anymore because we all have a billion voices of strangers stomping around in our heads making us fear and hate each other and ourselves. Social pressure is what drives people to want to make better choices, it’s what drives people to want to not look stupid so they will be pushed to learn about issues and ideas. Social pressure is a stronger guiding hand for morality and ethics than any legal or religious system. Instead of nurturing community we all have discord servers with other self-diagnosed people unwilling to answer the phone or even say hi to a stranger.

          This might not be the only problem we have, but it’s a huge one and we’re broadly not addressing it or caring how much harm it’s doing, and people, particularly in places like this, will feel so triggered by the mere suggestion that their online habits are depriving them of a better world and more opportunities that they’ll rage and drop essays about how much being online all the time has helped them, and then 5 minutes later make another post in another forum talking about how lonely and depressed they are. Make it make sense.

          • Contextual Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            I agree with you about the harms social media causes. It’s not helping matters at all, and actively harms people. But so does alcohol. Drinking can relax people, make them feel numb and happy for a short while. Doesn’t help them at all. But we don’t point the finger at alcohol, we say it’s a symptom of a larger problem. In this case I’m saying social media consumption is the same, just a symptom of a larger problem.

            And like alcohol, it doesn’t actually help at all. It just takes a person’s mind off their problems for a while. It lets them unplug and just mindlessly scroll Tiktok or Instagram. Say stupid shit on Twitter.

            Building community is an answer to this problem. Arguing on the internet is like yelling at the void, where speaking in person tends to make someone think more and be more mindful of what they say, since the repercussions are immediate and right on front of you. And it’s just better for the person too, getting to feel that connection to other people.

            The problem though, is that it takes a lot more effort, time, and money to participate in community. The people I’m talking about, simply can’t. They don’t have that time, energy, or money. They can’t afford to meet friends for dinner, even at each other’s homes. They can’t go meet friends at a nearby park because they’re exhausted from work. They can’t go hang out at a friend’s place because of the time commitment. The couple of hours they might have at the end of the day is spent browsing simply because it’s low energy and doesn’t cost them anything more. It’s the only thing that lets them unwind, or unplug, or blow off some steam.

            I think the answer is to have the community meet these people where they are. That’s a huge undertaking though, which is probably why we haven’t seen very much of it yet. But it’s going to be sorely needed.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Good comment. You see a lot of why dont all Americans just strike? type comments from people living in countries with workers protections.

  • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    Oh my, what will happen?

    Will we reach across the aisle and let cooler heads prevail by letting the killer go free?

    Or will the killer learn first hand that having a badge doesn’t mean he can kill random innocent people?

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Trump may not be able to pardon him but he can invade the state, take over the prison, have puppets do it for him, whatever. He’s not bound by law anymore, he does whatever the fuck he wants and somehow all those dumb Americans just let him get away with everything.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      The imperialism thing is nuts. He would absolutely send many millions to their death or into poverty merely for his own glorification.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      In a way, a gross overreaction by trump might wake more people up. Most here can see the boiled frog trajectory. Let others see that, while they can still help stop it. There’s a reason they do it slowly. They need to manufacture consent.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        You’re talking about firefighters standing in the middle of a huge ass forest fire, still doubting there’s a fire.

        There’s nothing done slowly. What Victor Orban did in 8 years turning Hungary into a dictatorship is what Trump did in the first 100 days of his second term.

        If people still fail to see what’s happening, it’s Idiocracy level stupidity. If people aren’t woken up by now, they will never wake up.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yet,.in Cambodia, a million people were genocided in the equivalent of trump’s first term. It’s all relative.

          For most people, despite the political landscape, their day to day is not changing that rapidly. It’s on the same gradual downward trajectory it has been for 20 years.

          Seeing heinous acts wakes them up. Things like cities being occupied. Ice murders etc. People are waking up but for those outside the affected cities they don’t feel unsafe. Yet.

        • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Idiocratic levels of stupidity is exactly what got us here in the first place. We can thank the magnificent American voters for this.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 days ago

        War crimes by invading Venezuela, kidnapping it’s “president”, taking bribes, pedophilia, influencing the stock market while profiting from it, shooting boats murdering its crew near Venezuela which are also war crimes, deporting us citizens, invading us cities, putting people in concentration camps in the US, Afrikan countries and El Salvador without process, the list goes on and on and on.

        But SCOTUS cleared him of prosecution for anything he does while being president.