

Except, as I have quoted, the USA did this to enforce a decision made by it’s domestic court.


Except, as I have quoted, the USA did this to enforce a decision made by it’s domestic court.


The operation was undertaken to enforce a warrant from a U.S. federal court
Today our UK Armed Forces showed skill and professionalism in support of a successful U.S. interception of the vessel Bella 1 while on its way to Russia. This action formed part of global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.
Well, certainly don’t count on the UK to support international law.


And yet there was a whole saga where world admins claimed being pro Luigi, especially mentioning jury nullification, constituted advocating for violence and they had to remove such posts due to ‘EU law’ according to legal advice they totally received.


New mods? Sir, this Lemmy.world .


Leader of the free world has quite a history, full of violations of other countries sovereignty.


They don’t mind regime change or unprovoked aggression against other countries. The US has a long history of such actions with no protest from the populace. Even Vietnam, the protest was about them having to risk their lives on the war. This time it’s because Trump is also dangerous to some of them.


So it’s not about all decks being the same.


Money, gambling is (even if obfuscated via tokens) about money.
Monopoly is not gambling because there is no (real) money involved. Uno is not gambling because there is no money involved.


Perhaps now that nvidia’s new driver excludes gtx-1000 series and older you would have to enter some commands to switch over gracefully.
For my 2070 to 5070 upgrade nothing was needed.


Reactionary forks don’t have a great record of success (or even getting off the ground).


And how is actual real life in America?
Somebody call an ambulance!!


Saying the quiet part aloud, just like Donald.


Holy shit a person dead for three consecutive years. It seems zero charges brought on (surely manslaughter?).


Why are you quoting the definition of meat? Your previous comment was about sausage.
If the qualifier is only meat, nothing can be called a sausage with all the filler and other ingredients they’re adding these days.
Which the proposal defines as:
But to the legislators of the EU, a sausage can now have only one meaning: a cylindrical object containing meat.
Nowhere does it say only meat.


That’s a dishonest representation of the qualifier. It’s must have meat not must have only meat.
Existing, probably.
Do they have him in custody?