• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2023

help-circle
  • The car is bad because of it’s inherent design flaws and bad UX.

    Robo Taxi, “not so full self driving” and similar things don’t make the car bad but show the practices Tesla uses to lure people into buying a car. By promising features they can’t deliver. Same with Tesla Semi, new Roadster, etc.

    About hating Elon. Hate is a strong word but he is clearly a faschist moron. That doesn’t make cars technically bad but I’d like to hear some arguments how a moron being in charge helps the company make better cars.

    And regarding science, there are some papers that show that cars with screens are way less safe because you have to look away to interact with it and that “glorified cruise control” too because you should pay attention because the car has too many flaws but in practice people stop paying attention.







  • If it does was you need it to do you should definitely use it, privacy vise it’s obviously way better than google. Haven’t tried in in about 2 years, maybe the search results got better but the last time I tried it often presented me weird sites that technically contained the words I searched for but were completely irrelevant - entered the same question onto Google and immediately got me a stack overflow question that was practically the same question I had but phrased a bit differently. But as I said, maybe it’s no longer so bad as when I tried it.






  • wischi@programming.devtomemes@lemmy.worldEating
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Nice though experiment, but doesn’t hold up to scrutiny on many levels (not meant in a condescending way, just to spinn that thought experiment further)

    First, we can’t even agree on how/what to exactly measure with penis length. Even if we fixed that, the actual distribution itself doesn’t have buckets (like size ranges) but would contain all data points individually. If we measure with unreasonably high precision and assume that penis length is a real (in a mathematical sense) number than there is a 0% chance that two people have the same penis length and there would be no person that has an exactly average penis length.

    Stepping back from this thought experiment, there is data for penis length and the standard deviation is wider than most people would expect, it’s far from 90% being average unless your average bucket is something like 5-20cm


  • wischi@programming.devtomemes@lemmy.worldEating
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I really appreciate people helping other people especially because the internet is often such a harsh and toxic place, but I don’t think presenting a counter that’s factually wrong really helps.

    And you are right, it’s not important. I mean it’s not even a requirement to have a penis at all for intimacy. So unless you don’t have a tongue, no hands (not even 10 fingers required) you should be ok. You could also try toys.

    Penis length is often an ego thing and that’s hard to fix in a lemmy comment.




  • wischi@programming.devtomemes@lemmy.worldEating
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    I think they disagree because not having a micropenis (in the medical sense) doesn’t imply that you are above average.

    Assuming penis length is distributed normally exactly 50% of people are below average. If you remove 0.15‰ from that you are practically still left with about 50% that don’t have a micropenis and are below average.