Venia Silente

Yes you did.

I don’t think those drugs help with the boypussy body posture?

Hopefully the Switcher can also get the expansion.

I fartwalked before it was cool.

Me being reminded I have my mbin account abandoned: 👀

Well, it should have been, once.

For those I just attach a note about it being an “IOT Error” in their report. Internet of Things is not, after all, that much different than a Internet of Tools.

Call me when it’s actually released. “We’ll release the music in the future” is worth exactly as much content as “we’ll release a Batgirl movie”.

Yeah but the interaction that is done in Australia is not part of the business chain. The catalogue was not mailed by my store. Someone else (an ISP, in this exercise) took it from an available stand in Italy and imported it (on their own) to Australia. (The closest I can think of to the material representation of “mailed catalogue” in this exercise is if I intentionally uploaded a copy of my .it website to an .au hosting)

For another analogy: if I were to post an Italian job offer in Italy, not only I am not subject to Malaysian (or Australian) labour law, but a third party in Malaysia reproducing the job offer there does not change that fact either. It’s their copy, and act-of-copy, of the job offer that is subject to Malaysian law, at best. And this should hold true regardless of the nature of the message: mere emission of the message can not be constituted as consecration of a legal responsibility towards any potential listener. If that was the case, it would be impossible to make any political, religious or scientific speech lawfully, as surely a law is being broken sometime, somewhere and a message can by its nature outlast the act of emission.

Nice try, fed.

A better analogy would be ‘Australian buys Italian goods from online store in Australia’.

The entire point of the analogy is that we are eschewing “online” stuff so that we can see how “bUt On tHE iNTeRnEt” applies, so “but make it an online store” is literally missing the point.

Better analogy in that sense would be still “Australian sends an agent to buy something from a physical store in Italy after finding a printed catalog that a third party imported into Australia from Italy”.

if you make your service available in Australia you must comply with Australian laws,

How does this even work? This is among the stupidest arguments I’ve ever heard on the internet, at about the same level of flat-earthism.

Are you saying if I am in Italy, selling Italian good on an Italian shop set in an Italian street, and an Australian tourist sends an agent to walk the Italian street and buy a thing for them from my Italian stand, I am somehow beholden to Australian law? This but “oN tHE iNtErNeT”?

Three diverging things can be all correct at the same time.

smell

tbf, the word smells better than the people (“peoploid”) it refers to.