Unfortunately it is the nature of the anti-coding-LLM debate that people who never wrote a line of assembly language, and never in their lives wrote a line of code that wouldn’t be run in a managed runtime of some kind, now think they’re the Masters of the Coding Universe and are qualified to dictate what are the Right Tools and the Wrong Tools to be a Real Programmer™.
Fortunately, as you rightly point out we’ve seen this dance a hundred times before. This too shall pass.
I suspect Instagram has done more to encourage custom silicone than the iPhone, tbh.
It’s only regressive when framed as a tax on consumers - which is of course easier to do in a ridiculous country that allows retailers to advertise prices without all the retailer’s costs included.
A properly organised VAT type tax is not regressive - it’s a tax on corporations that buy product for cents and then sell them on for dollars, pocketing the difference. I’ve no idea why sales taxes bring out this “but won’t somebody think of the corporations!” handwringing.
Do they actually teach Geography in US schools? Or were you homeschooled?
Clue: If I chose to “pop over” to Paris for lunch, it would be a 22 hour drive with no breaks, or more plausibly, a 3 hour flight. I have done it by train, but that’s still a couple of overnight trains (one night to Vienna, one more to say Frankfurt or Brussels, and then a few more hours on to Paris.)
What you’re really whining about is “we surrendered all power to an electoral system that concentrates all the power somewhere thousands of miles away, and in the hands of a man elected by something so far from democracy it’s laughable”. Which is very much on you, not geography.
Yep, I set mine up last weekend.
Used a nice Racknex rackmount kit to put a Raspberry Pi with SDR in the rack, and a little LCD display on the front that cycles through the details of aircraft currently in range - so it also serves the important purpose of Blinkenlights.
I’m fortunate to live close to two international airports (one small, one big) and under a reasonably busy flight corridor as well, so plenty of planes to spot - light aircraft, helicopters and military all the way up to A380s.
Quite; I just set a (locally hosted) LLM off writing the tickets for implementing all the opcodes in a simple device emulator, based on grovelling through datasheets and documentation. Whether the tickets get implemented by an AI or a human, it’s a timesaver having the AI do it, and the tickets will be better written than I would have done.
Everyone railing against this also overlooks the reality of professional software development: professional software is developed 5% by skilled, trained Software Engineers, and 95% by code monkeys who shotgun copypasta from Stack Overflow until it works. Even if we extremely generously assume that the hardcore “never use AI” Lemmy brigade are in the 5% (and not, more likely the 95% drowning in their own Dunning Kruger,) the “but AIs produce unreadable code and make mistakes” threat isn’t putting off anyone who’s ever actually had to hire a significantly sized development team.
Upvoting mainly for the exotic sight of a diaeresis outside the New Yorker.
A definite touch of class. Bravo.
TL;DR:
TWTLT;DR:
You can subnet logically with IPv4.
If you go IPv6 on the internal network you ‘win’ not having NAT, and exposing all your intrrnal services to the net (which… just why?), but lose the ability to do redundant ISPs/failover/loadbalancing, policy based routing, VPNs… Unless you do IPv6 address translation. Which puts you back to “IPv4+NAT, except more complicated.”
IPv6 inside the firewall is more or less entirely pointless.
I wouldn’t have an objection to paying them for that.
I did object them to them trying to charge me to stream from my server to my TV in the same house without touching any of Plex’s infrastructure at all, because their license-check is too dumb to understand some of us use things like “subnets”. (I objected even more that their “support” teams are evidently staffed by obnoxious jerks trained only to say “give us money”.)
Fortunately I found the switch to Jellyfin incredibly easy, and so far it’s actually been more reliable than Plex ever was.
Samsung launched DeX almost a decade ago (and it is genuinely useful, I use my tablet from time to time as a laptop replacement when I really want to travel light.)
Android finally came up with a desktop mode, what, a month ago?
One of the problems the anti-AI crowd have with protrsting this use case is that they don’t seem to appreciate that the enshittification happened long before AI.
Actual Software Engineers make up about 5% of the profession, the other 95% have been turning out slop that they don’t even understand themselves for years. In that environment, an AI that does the same but at least doesn’t complain when asked to do rework doesn’t seem so bad.
You really needed a better CS professor.
If you’re writing code that you don’t understand without treating it like a goddamned microbe in a petri dish, you are the slop coder.
If Americans were allowed books, they’d be really angry about this.
🎶 O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave 🎶 O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
I was contributing to Open Source almost certainly before you were born, so wind your neck in kid. But, even if we suppose you are right and the GPL somehow restricts the use of licensed works for AI training (although a quick refresh on the license shows no evidence that it does) - while GPL fanatics make the most noise, it is absolutely not the most popular open source license.
GPL variants covers roughly 20% of the licensed work on Github. The vast majority of such work is permissive open-source licensed, with the MIT license covering almost 50% alone. That’s because the vast majority of open source contributors are not in fact wannabe Citizen Smiths, but rather people who want, without restriction, to contribute to the advancement of computing.
Have you ever read an open source license? They gave away those rights, voluntarily.
If you have evidence that AI is being trained on world licensed to the contrary then by all means get exercised about those “workers” rights (right on, man,) but given the vast quantities of code released under permissive open source licenses, it’s not going to change anything.
Starlink coming back to Earth?
I don’t know if it was a decade ahead, but it was really nice. Well thought out UI, really nice and fluid even on not the best hardware, the address-book integration with messaging and throughout the OS was really nice for its time, and some of the phones were actually pretty good (my Nokia had a great camera compared to most.)
Most important for me, at the time it had by far the best dual-SIM support - with active/active radios and proper management of things like separate default SIM for messaging/calls/data at a time when most Android phones with dual SIM were pretty awful, and nearly a decade before Apple would offer dual SIM at all.
I was genuinely sorry to let my last Windows Phone go.
How is it “stealing” if it’s open source?
I have sympathy with artists, authors and the like whose work was taken to train AIs. But software engineering - nah. We gave the training data away for free, neatly catalogued in bitesize chunks with explanations for every change - we don’t get to call “take backsies” now.
Neat; sounds like a combination of traditional processing units, with FPGA-style reprogrammable logic for interconnection between them. I’m sold :^).