She tours foreign countries for clout. She used to be a host for a program on the Swedish far-right party’s Youtube channel. The irony completely lost on them having an immigrant telling them what to think.

Gives you a shell where you basically are sudo for every command.

What do you mean? This

remoteuser@server$ nc -l -p 4444 > /dev/input/event0


localuser@laptop$ cat /dev/input/event0 | nc server 4444

doesn’t work?

The bum on the rods is hunted down as an enemy of mankind
The other is driven around to his club, is feted, wined and dined

And they who curse the bum on the rods as the essence of all that’s bad
Will greet the other with a willing smile and extend a hand so glad

The bum on the rods is a social flea who gets an occassional bite
The bum on the plush is a social leech, bloodsucking day and night

The bum on the rods is a load so light that his weight we scarcely feel
But it takes the labour of dozens of folks to furnish the other a meal

As long as we sanction the bum on the plush the other will always be there
But rid ourselves of the bum on the plush and the other will dissappear

Then make an intelligent organised kick get rid of the weights that crush
Dont worry about the bum on the rods get rid of the bum on the plush

The sun is in the cloud(s)?

Not only was Trump open about it, but basically everyone who was not a fanatic warned them about it.

I found this

This manuscript was developed in dialogue with several artificial intelligence system

I guess that is why you say

With this project having escaped my competence long ago

OK. Just to let you know, nothing here makes sense.

Tanke my question. Like on some level, “$g_{rr}$” is the correct answer. But not in the context of the text in the manuscript. Then the answer would be “there is no spatial curvature in that metric, that statement and the section is wrong”.

Your suggested improvements at the end of the comment would not help the situation either. None of them relevantly addresses the issue.

Your answer here makes no sense. For the gravitational lensing calculation you use one metric. Here you try to juggle three metrics at once to… I’m not sure what the intent is, but there are barely anything that makes sense.

Look. If you think that anything here make sense, that you believe that anything that these LLMs your are using is getting closer to some new description of reality, or are even coherent, then I advise you to talk to someone. Like a health professional. What you are doing is not healthy. I’m saying this out of genuine consern.

I will not engage you on this anymore. Just one last thing before I leave, you are not to mention my user name in any contribution nor acknowledgment. Nothing I have said is to be taken as a positive encuragement as to indicate that you are making anything useful here. Hence it would not make sense to make a reference to this conversation as any sort of contribution, as it is not an attempt at contributing but only to critique. So please, do not attribute this to some “community contribution” in any of your texts.

May not be completely on topic… but in your manuscript there you appear to make physics claims. What are those actually? Like you appear to claim to resolve black hole singularities, but there is no substance in the article. Before solving unsolved problem, your theory must reproduce old results, in some way.

An example of common GR exercises you should be able to reproduce is like the gravitational bending of light. Good, you have a chapter on that. However, it contains several errors and appears not to contain references to the claims or derivation of them from your “theory”. Like here is the simplest, first GR lecture stuff, on that section, you write:

The factor of 4 (twice the Newtonian value) comes from the equal contribution of the temporal and spatial curvature in the metric

Can you point to the spatial curvature part of that metric you show there? The one you say contribute an equal factor to the light bending angle.

Then I’d have a lot of follow ups, but it would be helpful to spell out that in this section on light bending is derived from your priciples and what are just suppose to be GR statements.

It appears a screenshot of a social mediapost saying “How hot do you think Freud’s mom was” (implying thats where he got his ideas from) has caused an interest in these memes.

Do you really see this? In what country? Like most of Sweden may dislike Trump, but more than half wants his politics here; isolationist, racist, nationalist, deregulation, privitization. The party leaders sometimes call out Trump and their dislike for him, and people eat it up and still vote for the same politics. I see nothing changing here.

I don’t use .desktop files that much… But I guess xfce is X and not wayland. Check the DISPLAY env var for your user and set the same in your script there or run the binary with that env var.

I find it very useful, and it conflicts with normal copy paste very rarely. There are two clipboards, one is filled with latest highlighted, and the other with latest Ctrl+C:ed. Middle click pastes from the first, Ctrl+V from the second. This makes you able to copy two things at once: ctrl+c something first, highlight something else second, paste in any order. The confusing thing when learing to use it for me was that since I need to highlight to ctrl+c, I will overwrite what is in the middle click clipboard, and it also means you cannot highlight something to replace it with whats in your middle click clipboard. It does however mean that most times you want to do a ctrl+c/ctrl+v both clipboards are in sync. Not sure why, but I often find myself having to copy/paste two things at once, and I use both buffers without thinking. Which makes it impossible to use macos.

“Other Unix-like”, do they mean like open/free/netBSD and that class? Because macos does not have that, right? Only some terminals emulate that behaviour by overwriting the normal clipboard, making it very hard to switch between them.

Wow, that is so messed up

If it helps them secure their existence, I’m for it. The e-mails you get after you donated once though… They are like from a jealous boyfriend, so increadibly weired. “Our final e-mail”, it was not (got 12 more after the first “final”), “We’ve had enough”, fuck did I do? “It’s non-negotiable”, what, I have to donate again?, sometimes they thow in your first name in the subject too to really make you feel guilty.

Link is dead?

Is… this an ad for airbnb?

“for each hour in GW”? Those are dimensionless values, percentages out of a total. The unit is irreleveant… so it feels the data is misleading somehow.

No, this is what causes high crime rates! If you want lower crime rates you just outlaw law.

Annie Lööf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Lööf

While she is a crazy economically far right politician, who wants everyone to have higher rents, no welfare, and so on, the one thing her party (through many party leader switches since her) still stands against is the populist racist far right. While all other right wing parties adopted the far-right language and started collaborating with them, her party did not, and left their previous coallition to be in opposition instead. I have probably zero respect and understanding for her and her party’s politics, except for that one point. This position also led her to be a target of a planned neo nazi assassination, because of all the hate the far right (here I mean hate the actual far right party, which all the right parties collaborates with openly had for her) has for her and her party.