VindictiveJudge

I’ve also seen volume settings not kick in until you loaded a save file. Also, PS1 era Final Fantasy games that don’t acknowledge your button mappings until the save has been loaded, so that B is select and A is cancel on the main menu, but the other way in-game.

RPGs are absolutely terrible about giving you the ability to inflict status effects on enemies, but not giving random encounter enemies enough HP to justify inflicting statuses, and then also making the bosses immune to them.

There’s also the possibility that Vance invokes the 25th two years and one month into Trump’s term. He gets to be either the guy that saved America or the guy who made the tough choice for the good of the nation. Then he’s POTUS for nearly two years and can still be elected to two terms. If this is his plan, he’ll start sounding half-way reasonable in six months.

And the point I’m making is that only a handful of games are keys; the vast majority are still on the cart, same as the last system.

Games aren’t “games”, they’re download keys.

Generally agree with your post, but a large majority of games really are games. If they’re a download key, it’s very clearly labelled on the box.

That was a retcon that Abrams introduced at the last minute.

Snoke being Plagueis would have broken the entire Chosen One Prophecy just as much as the return of Palpatine did. Having Snoke being from a new dark side order that wasn’t the Sith was one of the better things the sequels did.

There weren’t a whole lot of jedi to make a new generation of jedi after order 66

Totally irrelevant. Force sensitivity is largely random and Jedi almost never have kids anyway.

If you read the quoted section of article in the post body, it explains the difference.

And so do the people inside the big helicopter!

Depending on the sword, a gallon of milk is between three and six times the weight of the sword.

To be clear, they don’t need to be sincere; it’s in the best interest of anyone following Putin to unfuck their economy, get on the good side of the oligarchs, and modernize their military. The quickest and easiest way to do that is to get out of Ukraine, blame everything on Putin, and at least put on a veneer of civility until things are going smoothly for them. Even if they want to continue expanding the Russian empire, they really need to get out of the current quagmire first.

Which is exactly why I hated them resigning in protest.

I’d argue the smart thing when succeeding Putin would be to end the war, tell the world it’s a new Russia, and start getting Russian assets unfrozen.

I would expect the VP to be set up as a puppet leader, with her brother as a hostage to force her cooperation.

Edit: Looks like she might not be cooperating.

I dunno. I look almost exactly like my mother’s father, so that would make things even weirder.

Because they’re indicating that is the exact word used in Disney’s statement.

I don’t think we’ve deviated far at all. Our attitudes toward animals are the product of thousands or tens of thousands, depending on the species, of years of cultural development combined with the fact that we are, ultimately, just predatory social apes. We have an instinctual craving for meat, and culture directs that craving. Even our aversion to cannibalism is, ultimately, cultural.

We’ve only recently seen shifts in cultural attitudes toward meat consumption and general treatment of animals with very little deviation having occured since the first cities were founded. And those shifts were only possible due to recent advances in agriculture and the invention of the internal combustion engine. Things won’t change quickly because nobody wants to be told that their beloved family recipe that they have fond childhood memories of is weird, or wrong, or evil. People tend to react poorly to having something they see as part of their identity questioned, getting aggressive, defensive, just shutting down, or digging in their heels and doubling down.

If your goal with this is to get people to stop eating meat, then I’ll point out that people tend to respond better to possitive interactions. “I like that dish, and I’ve found you can replace [meat] with [alternative] if you’re on a budget,” or just suggesting a vegetarian or vegan recipe without mentioning that it’s vegetarian will produce more possitive results than just telling people why they shouldn’t eat meat. I’ve reduced my own meat consumption significantly due to that kind of thing. But you can’t convince people not to do something if you don’t understand why they do it in the first place.

Some cultures do eat horses without any taboos. Whether or not your culture does is linked to whether your ancestors cultivated wheat or rice. Wheat cultivating humans bred horses to help with tilling the soil and harvesting the wheat, making them too valuable to eat. Rice cultivating humans needed to cultivate and harvest rice by hand, resulting in horses being used for other things. In both cases, mechanization has resulted in horses being largely obsolete for human uses, but cultural bonds remain and they became pets, particularly in the wheat focused cultures.

Herbivores pretty consistently taste better than carnivores. Cats also developed a symbiotic relationship with humans when humans developed agriculture.