• 1 Post
  • 219 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 18th, 2026

help-circle

  • Cornyn spent his credibility backing Trump and this is what he has to show for it. This is why anyone backing Trump as a political calculus, from old-school GOP to MAGA drum-beaters, are tragically deluded.

    Trump is an arch narcissist. He’s never ever going to be satisfied. Your only - only - reliable move is to fully surrender your entire agency to Trump. Any other “compromise” is temporary and Trump will keep moving the goalposts further no matter what you do, with no loyalty, replacing you with someone more sycophantic the moment he finds them. The only move is not to play.

    But gosh, that’s too hard for all of these conservatives. They all think they’re smart enough to be the exception, that they’re just going to play along and get what they want, that it’s definitely going to be different for them this time.


  • The 25-page IRS memorandum was given to top Treasury officials last month but it’s unclear if it ever made it to the DOJ. The memo stated that Trump’s lawsuit was filed two years too late. Federal statute requires that people suing the IRS for unfairly released tax information must do so within two years of the infraction. Trump claimed not to have known about the tax information leak until January 2024, but the memo notes that Alina Habba—one of Trump’s personal lawyers–was present at the trial of IRS leaker Charles Littlejohn in October 2023. Trump did not file a complaint until January 2026, over two years later.

    Just making to crystal clear for everyone: a statute of limitations defense, where there is incontrovertible evidence that there is no delay in discovery of the cause of action, is about as bulletproof of a legal defense as you can get.

    So two things

    1. This shows that Trump’s case was frivolous and meritless to any first-year law student, much less the “top lawyers” at the DOJ that assessed this. Trump and his lawyer should be sanctioned at the very least.
    2. Because the DOJ is agreeing to settle this, Todd Blanche and any other lawyers who had to approve the settlement should now have criminal liability for conspiracy to defraud the US government. Because Trump is in control of the DOJ, if it can be shown he was involved in the settlement from the DOJ’s side (which seems almost certain), he should be part of the same criminal conspiracy.












  • Imagine being so rich and entitled that you demand everyone else in the country spend $1 billion to build a facility that will (just partially) give you medical attention.

    Now imagine being elected to represent the people who the rich guy wants to pay for that, and spending your term not representing those peoples’ interests but instead finding new ways to justify giving the already rich guy their money.

    Now imagine being the voters living paycheck to paycheck and seeing both of these things, and being like, “Well, at least it isn’t Kamala.”

    At this point my head hurts and I can’t imagine any more for some reason.




  • The articles are doing a disservice by treating DOJ and Trump’s actions to “settle” the “case” (quotations since neither is legitimate) as if it was already done. No, Trump is still trying to do it. It’s a common tactic of Trump’s team to act lawlessly and make people feel powerless and resigned that it’s already done. This particular criminal looting is not beyond intervention yet.

    It least it seems, this needs to be approved by a judge who has not yet ruled on the requests to dismiss the case (and thereby allow the settlement to proceed):

    Nearly 100 Democrats in the House of Representatives signed onto a legal brief urging a judge to block what they described as an unprecedented resolution that they said would unjustly enrich people close to the president with taxpayer dollars and open the door to meritless claims of political persecution. … Trump’s attorneys suggested in their court filing seeking to dismiss the case that the resolution would not be reviewable by a judge. But a group of 93 members of Congress filed a brief teeing up a challenge. … Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, an advocacy group that filed an earlier brief, said in response to the dismissal: “This case was always a sham, and another ploy by the President to access taxpayer funds to line his pockets.”

    The headlines basically are saying, this is a deal, it’s done. The last quote above suggests there is a “dismissal” but elsewhere clearly implies the dismissal request is pending. A reader may feel like this already happened and therefore there’s nothing they can do about it. And indeed, it may happen. But the judge already said she is looking at the conflict of interest issue:

    Kathleen Williams, the judge heading the case, had assigned a group of attorneys to determine whether there was a conflict in the case since, as sitting president, he was suing “entities whose decisions are subject to his direction.”


  • P retty good feeling about canceling Netflix.

    I can’t remember the last time I saw something worthwhile.

    R eally, it’s just cookie-cutter junk that they are clearly making to check a box.

    A nd for what purpose?

    T o just keep us watching show after show rather than do something productive.

    E ven when I find a show with a premise I like, it’s so padded with filler I don’t even know why I watch it.

    I just think they’ve forgotten the purpose they served, which is provide a service more convenient than downloading.

    T hat’s what I think anyway.