Cryptography nerd

Fediverse accounts;
@Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
@Natanael@infosec.pub
@Natanael@lemmy.zip

Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub

@Natanael_L@mastodon.social

Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social

  • 43 Posts
  • 66 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 18th, 2025

help-circle







  • That argument works when the difference is small.

    That argument doesn’t work when one option is a cataclysmic disaster

    But most importantly - when you look at what policies that Trump voters said they voted for, you could divide that into a fraction of voters voting for evil (plain stupid racists), and a large fraction voting for something positive which they had been told Trump would deliver - yet which he was objectively worse at. Most people voted Trump for the economy while told he was a great businessman, or for healthcare while told he’d make health insurance more affordable (but now he made it less), etc…

    Almost every positive impact in the last decades that his voters attributed to him was delivered by his opposition.

    This wasn’t an election lost to attrition. Your quote explains nothing about what happened.

    There was more votes than ever. It was lost to propaganda and people being idiots, not seeing through the fraud. Trump’s policies lost every poll when names were taken off. Everything he wanted to do kept being rejected. But the propaganda machine made people distrust the people who delivered all the things they said they were grateful for, and to trust the liar instead.