You a potato?

If it did it would be simple to train a healthy and truthful facts AI, you would simply train it off from the truthful and healthy facts.

Not how AI works. I mean, it’s technically possible to train an AI that only generates truth, but it would be so overfitted that it’s functionally no different from the search bar on Wikipedia.

Large language models need randomness to function. They cut up every true sentence in the training data into tiny tokens and reassemble them into… well, whatever arrangement of tokens satisfies the discriminator or the humans who grade the output. Discriminators can’t tell fact from fiction and the humans generally don’t care to.

Even if you valued truth above all else during the training and rejected every false statement you encounter, there’s no way you could judge the truth of every possible statement the system could ever produce. And with randomness most statements will be false, that’s simply the nature of truth.

He just got his daemon, there’s no way it already settled into its final shape.

Michael Vsauce has a solution for that last part: slap bracelets with the locations of things that were lost for centuries. Whenever you end up*, the bracelet has a couple things on there that are lost and could be found.

How to prove you’re a time traveller - The Rest Is Science (45:27)

*) In the last couple centuries at least, the further back you go, the fewer things are lost.

Came here to say exactly this tbh. Apply analytical math to Earth sphere and discover 2 opposite hemispheres rotating in opposite directions - equal to a ZERO value existence. In other words, 4 Earth Quadrants simultaneously rotate inside 4 Time Cube Quarters to create 4 - 24 hour days within one Earth rotation.

Put a big wind-up key on the back for when it runs out.

Imagine how sexy he would be with full chest hair though

bounced on my boy’s challenging lengthy to this until he boisterous stuffed

Everyone who plays Factorio knows that the best builds emerge from the knot of conveyors and pipes that got you to bue science. Sure, you could design for scale, but where’s the fun in that?

Oh, I don’t see it as apples or oranges, but more like eating or not eating. Stopping people from eating is morally bad and vice-versa, giving people food is morally good. Apply that to gay sex directly without thinking about the implications of the analogy too hard. Ergo, homosexuality is morally good (but so is hetero-, bi- and even asexuality (the analogy breaks down too much)).

It doesn’t look like there was an option for “morally good”, so I’d have picked morally acceptable. “Not a moral issue” is for when I’ve never though about it in terms of morals, which automatically excludes any big life decision or matter of personal conviction.

Checked the whole thread to see if the Eurovision train song was mentioned already. Chisinau - Bucharest!

Viscount Rothermere

Had to look up if that’s someone’s name or what. It’s Harold Hamsworth, owner and founder of the Daily Mail and unapologetic racist, elitist, nazi piece of shit.

It’s crazy to me that people like this were still allowed to own newspapers after the war. You don’t have to put them against the wall, but you can at least take away their power.

The meteor was, according to NASA, about 2 feet across and weighed 1000 pounds. So their baby elephants are on the lighter side and their corgis are fairly normal size.

I’m going to assume a sphere, 60 centimeters in diameter, and a weight of 450 kg. Volume of the sphere is 113000cm³, which gives us a density of 3,9g/cm³. That’s heavier than most rocks (silicon at 2.3), but much lighter than iron (7.9).

If he couldn’t tell the difference, he’d have said that Netanyahu tried to take Kyiv or that Zelensky leads the APF. That would be a terrible mistake to make.

He can tell the difference though. When making an analogy, you can ignore some of the differences to make a point about the similarities. And if there are relevant differences, the question he posed will draw those out. It’s a good question.

It is someone roleplaying as Milo Murphy from the animated series Milo Murphy’s Law. The joke is that Milo is a direct descendant of that Murphy and the Law describes his family.

Is this peak denimization? Like, what could you denimize to beat jarretels? There’s nothing left except dedenimizing something that is denim by default and then redenimizing it.

She played a main character in Camp Rock and had her own Disney Channel series for a bit. Beyond that I don’t really know, but many of those Disney Channel kids had very succesful careers in showbiz. Once you have a foot in the door, you get voice acting bits, appearances on variety shows, just general celeb work on name recognition alone.

Good post. Well… good edit, because that first paragraph makes no sense. But I agree with the other six!

As if any of your victims will ever see the reveal. None of the other grifters will want to expose you and your reveal won’t be boosted by the fascist algorithms, so for your victims it will be just like you dropped off the face of the earth, if they remember you at all between the dozen new scammers they see every day.