

they never specified it to be scientific or rigorous.


they never specified it to be scientific or rigorous.


This could have been amazing if integrated into a district heating network.
alternate caption:
“has feet”


this sends a clear message though. No the old “just hook them, then we have guaranteed income forever” isn’t actually working. That’s great.


Should have accompanied the jokes with treats


Thats why I’m saying borders on. I know it’s not technically plagiarizing, but they really did just lift the video into text form and call it their own article.
Yes they credit her, but what did they actually add themselves?


The article is essentially a text version of that video.


Huh, this borders on plagiarism.
This article is essentially a transcription of this video https://youtu.be/WnzR5aOElvw


but only if the platform is sufficiently large
hm, that sounds sensible actually
Are you ok?
Have they solved the huge unsolved problem no one else has solved
yeah, no.
oh no that one actually hits the nail on the head. That’s exactly how these read.
I agree with the sentiment, I just found it to be a funny context to bring it up in ;)
your talk about art sparking the imagination tells me you don’t see two legs and a jar in the tv shadow.
…or maybe you do, who am i to judge.


well, “scammers in iran” doing it, and “iran” doing it, is two very different statements.


oh that is clever!
“Your password doesnt meet the required 64 bits of entropy”