

Based on accounts I’ve read, he was always racist and an anti-intellectual. He just got more bold. He was a very early Trump supporter.


Based on accounts I’ve read, he was always racist and an anti-intellectual. He just got more bold. He was a very early Trump supporter.


“There is genuine fear that indeed ICE’s heavy-handedness and the rhetoric from Washington is more creating a condition where the officers’ lives are in danger rather than the other way around.”
What the fuck.
This dipshit literally thinks it should be our lives in danger. These people deserve everything coming to them.


It would be a shame if they were swatted. That sort of thing can cause serious trauma.


Modern day siren.


Tuesday is tacos, Wednesday will be grilled cheese with tomato soup and Thursday will be spaghetti.
I could prepare meals for the next several weeks with what is on hand, dependent on how many people I’m feeding.


That context doesn’t change the reality. It is abuse. It’s normalized for you but it’s still not abused.
Being able to use critical thinking skills to predict where the abuse might stem from is good, it means you haven’t internalized it.
You are depressed and need to speak to a therapist, internet stranger or whatever. The important part is it needs to be someone that is not close to your family so they can offer an honest assessment of your situation as you experience it.
From there you can build up what you’ve already established and gain a solid perspective of the situation and from there create a plan to remove yourself from the situation and begin healing.


If you’re blaming others for your negativity via voice or action then you are abusing them.


It is abuse. Sounds like it too but it is also absolutely abuse.


I love how you respond with an ad hominem attack to a comment you labeled as ad hominem.
My comment was a joke. I can tell you’re a Russian bot because of the lack of humor detection.

It effects cravings so it could change what is craved.


Exposure to cold weather does increase heart attack risk.
The article leaves this unsaid but it isn’t actually irrelevant. Of course, given the prevelance of clickbait, it’s likely a coincidence.


Them not caring about the numbers doesn’t mean they don’t care about people being bothered by the numbers.


Did you ask the LLM to add spelling mistakes? Because it over did it.
The contractions we say are more loose than what we write. Couldn’t’ve is my go to example.


My current company won’t let use talk to potential hires because we haven’t gone through the company training for It. It’s great.
A couple companies ago I was doing the hiring for the team and they pushed for the whole group interview thing, it was a huge waste of time. It’s not just wasting the interviewees time, it’s just another pointless meeting for the employees. It’s indicates the company doesn’t value anyone’s time.


Really depends on how much money is involved. A junior position, how much is there really to discuss. Someone at the top of their field should take longer because they are interviewing the company.
Thank you. I was trying to remember this one. It’s Dunning Kruger adjacent but one is evaluate one’s own knowledge while the other is one evaluating another’s knowledge.
People have literally experienced psychosis by doing both at once.
billionaires love it
They think it knows everything because they know nothing.
He was always a racist.