VR seems the most like death, and if you’re on hardware and have infinite time you can probably eventually find a security exploit for root access, at which point you can build your chosen reality

Tomato for sure. Made into fries would be excellent

Unga bunga

That’s what I’ve been doing. It’s really lonely

Never had either so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Fibonacci heaps are pretty cool. Not used very often b/c they’re awful to implement, but better complexity than many other heaps.

Also Binary Lifting is closer to an algorithm than a data structure but it’s used in Competitive Programming a fair bit, and isn’t often taught: https://cp-algorithms.com/graph/lca_binary_lifting.html

And again closer to an algo tham a data structure, but Sum over Subsets DP in 3^n also has a cool little bit of math in it: https://cp-algorithms.com/algebra/all-submasks.html

Replying to “You’re being abnormally violent” with “Wouldn’t happen if you were more polite” is deeply missing the point.

Insisting that you get to choose the forum, and the format, and the rules for debate is part of the debate.

Is that kolananski?

https://paulgraham.com/avg.html

Go and Python and Typescript all have their own footguns.

I assume Rust is the same, but haven’t used it personally to see

Sorry about your balls man.

https://github.com/thoughtbot/rcm once upon a time, but I haven’t really had multiple dev computers for a while

It’s one thing to try and be beautiful, say by putting on makeup. It’s another entirely to worship beauty so much that you inject a deadly neurotoxin into your face (often with disastrous results) for it. And this is often done by actors, literally people paid in large part for their existing beauty.

It making them happy (which I doubt) doesn’t mean it’s safe, and doesn’t mean that they have good values.

Also the number of outcomes isn’t connected to the solution space reduction the way you say. If you don’t know whether the fake coin is heavier or lighter, both tilt-right and tilt-left are effectively the same result. So at least your first test really only has 2 meaningful outcomes.

In general, you’ll only reduce your solution space DOWN TO (not by) 1/(number of distinguishable outcomes) if the possible solutions are evenly divided among those outcomes. It’s easy to have a problem where “result 1 narrows it down a lot, result 2 doesn’t tell us much”

If you don’t know whether it’s heavier or lighter, after the first test shows uneven you still have 6 coins possible. You can do it in 3 tests only if you know lighter vs heavier for the fake coin.

You can actually change the functionality of some punctuation, such as is used in my favorite command

:()::;:

Cube of instant castle: Say the keyword ‘open’ to transform this cube into a '200x’200 castle. The transformation happens instantly, and if you’re caught in the area of effect, be prepared to get smashed. The cube is hard of hearing.