• 0 Posts
  • 111 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2025

help-circle

  • The whole premise here was that people are being told something

    Where did you get that from?? The premise here was that someone (you? Can’t remember) said that “it’s obvious” that someone from the .ml instance would have certain views. Who tells the majority of people on the Internet what kind of instance .ml is?

    If somebody’s repeatedly told that they’re probably a lunatic because of the .ml attached to their name they’ll know something’s up.

    Super heavy vibes of “if someone’s repeatedly told that they have thick skin and don’t need painkillers because of the dark skin, they’ll know it’s true”.

    We need a new name for this - “racism” but towards people using the 'incorrect" Lemmy domain.

    This isn’t about not telling people, this is about treating people like they know what they’re doing and telling them

    Exactly! “It’s common knowledge that black people have night blindness” vibe.

    You say we can’t expect people to know the symbolism they surround themselves with

    What is the “symbolism” of the .ml instance? Look at what a new user sees when they get there - their sidebar description and their rules, and show me where the symbolism is that makes them the “undesirable” instance.

    I’ll, however, assume that the next person I see wearing a swastika is, in fact, a lunatic moron, and not just a poor fella who unknowingly made a wrong pick in the thrift store.

    I’ll, however, assume that the next person I see wearing a swastika is, in fact, a lunatic moron, and not just a poor fella who unknowingly made a wrong pick in the thrift store.

    Comparing the .ml domain to a swastika is just peak Lemmy delusion. Get help, friend, go outside. There’s life outside the Internet too!


  • Alaknár@sopuli.xyztoComic Strips@lemmy.worldPoor representation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    You can always assume people do stuff knowingly

    Only if you really, fundamentally, don’t know people.

    They usually tell you that they didn’t if they didn’t.

    Yeah, you just non-stop get these interactions where someone who has absolutely no clue about what kind of company Nestlé is grabs you by the shoulder and goes “I only bought Nescafe because there wasn’t anything else in the store, I swear!”


  • So, what you’re writing is in good faith, I can tell, but shows a fundamental lack of understanding how shares work.

    If the value of a company goes up, the number of shares doesn’t change, the price per share increases. So, if a company emitted 100 shares, and they were valued at $10 each, for the worth of the company being $1,000.

    Now, stuff happens, and the company is now worth $10,000. It doesn’t mean that there are now 1000 shares, it means that each share is now worth $100.

    Which means that there are no “excess shares”.

    What a company could do is something called “stock dilution”. For example, you have that company from before, worth $10,000, with 100 shares, $100 per share, right? They dilute the shares and emit another 100 shares, bringing the total to 200. But the value of the company is still $10,000, it just means that the value per share is now $50.

    Seems like a good idea? Here’s the problem - control over a company is still determined by the percentage of owned shares. You had 100 shares? You need 51 to independently control the company. You now have 200? You now need 101 shares for the exact same level of control.

    Which means: either the CEO of that company loses control of the company (effectively “gives it away”, potentially to malicious actors from the competition who just want to shut him down), or he still needs to own 50%+1 shares (so from 51 to 101 shares), meaning his wealth doesn’t change at all.








  • Alright, let’s run a quick model.

    Let’s say the upper cap is $1000k.

    You are a CEO and you get a salary of, say, $10k, plus 1000 shares, each worth $1. So, in total, that year your worth is $120k + $1000 = $121k.

    Now, you’re incredibly successful as a CEO, you make your shareholders drool for your company’s shares. Which makes their price skyrocket. Each share is now worth $1000! Such success!

    But wait! No! Catastrophe!

    Your worth has just gone up to $120k + $1000k! The share’s value on their own hits the upper limit of wealth!

    They’re not your money, mind you, you can’t do anything with them unless you cash them in, sell them.

    So, you have two choices - you stop getting any salary and have $0 for spending (hopefully the office cafeteria is well stocked!), or you sell some shares, give the money to charity, and pray the stock price doesn’t go up. And if it does, you have to sell again, lose the money, and… oh, but now you no longer hold a controlling interest in your own company - some three dudes who work together bought up the shares, spread them around evenly (so neither of them goes above the $1000k), and they effectively control your own company, telling you what to do with it.

    Companies shouldn’t be able to have over, say 1000 employees either.

    So, instead of having some large companies, you end up with chains of “totally not the same” companies that just work together. “Oh, we’ve outsourced our HR to company X, which is Totally Not The Same as our company, they just don’t work with anybody else and we have full data transparency with them.”


  • Alaknár@sopuli.xyztoComic Strips@lemmy.worldPoor representation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Holy shit, are you serious…?

    You expect Joe Average and Jane Random to not only have to deal with Fediverse’s fragmentation, not only have to figure out which instances are actually maintained and relatively active, you expect them to also research the politics of each instance before they sign up? And it’s not just that you expect Joe Average, and Jane Random to do that, you’re so certain they actually do it, that you’re perfectly comfortable assuming every single .ml user has identical political views and stances?

    Am I getting this right?



  • Alaknár@sopuli.xyztoComic Strips@lemmy.worldPoor representation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, here, where we treasure inclusion, freedom, and human rights, we don’t really talk with those people. They are weird and obnoxious. Fortunately, it’s easy to spot them. No, no, not by their skin colour, just the name of their instance. No, no, it’s nothing like hating people from a certain country, silly, it’s about an entire Lemmy instance, it’s completely different!




  • Alaknár@sopuli.xyztoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHeave-ho!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yup! Some 90-95% of women wear the wrong bras. Especially those who have been extremely gifted by nature, this can lead to pain in their later years.

    Going to an actual bra fitter and getting a fitted bra or two is something every woman should get. So, people, if you love your gals, get them a gift of an actually will-fitted bra. Doesn’t need to be fancy, but if it fits, she will love you for it!

    Source: SO got a fitted bra, couldn’t shut up about it for three months, just being in complete shock about how comfortable it was.


  • Are you serious?

    You’re wondering why does anyone give a shit about the guy who choked on Trump’s dick for the past 10 years, the guy who believed any anti-left wing conspiracy theory, the guy who had a hand in spreading QAnon bullshit, the guy who really put his considerable weight into getting Trump elected while completely whitewashing him and calling out people criticising him as having the “Trump Derangement Syndrome”, THAT guy, is now criticising Trump and his policies?

    This is what you’re having a difficult time understanding?