Hmmm you are probably right, it does seem like the person in question is flooding the chat with the word. That is a problem, the word itself should not be (probably except when intentionally used to cause harm, but intention is quite difficult to measure or prove)
The context removes all ambiguity. Spamming a slur in a public forum isn’t a debate about the word; it’s an attack on the community. The proof is in the outcome: hundreds of people have left the chat due to Valve’s non-existent moderation.
![The true beauty behind Valve's "hands-off" approach to moderating group chats [CW: Racism]](https://crazypeople.online/pictrs/image/572ed67f-7951-4688-aa83-1e3f9ae46487.png){kind=link}
Hmmm you are probably right, it does seem like the person in question is flooding the chat with the word. That is a problem, the word itself should not be (probably except when intentionally used to cause harm, but intention is quite difficult to measure or prove)
The context removes all ambiguity. Spamming a slur in a public forum isn’t a debate about the word; it’s an attack on the community. The proof is in the outcome: hundreds of people have left the chat due to Valve’s non-existent moderation.