Yeah I installed that one you’re thinking of.

  • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    less likely to break during an update

    In my experience, Ubuntu and Debian are by far the most likely to break during an upgrade

      • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Apt is one of the worst package managers I’ve used. Yum is also trash, dnf a bit better. But pacman is by far the best

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I haven’t used pacman in ages and I don’t remember rolling back updates with it so I either never needed to or it was not possible at the time.

          dnf did everything I needed it to so I wouldn’t know what to fault it for

          • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You can very easily rollback updates from cache, and even rollback all your packages to a specific date in time.

            It does get a bit iffy with AUR packages because you often compile them locally, so they would need to be recompiled from a specific commit.

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Now that you mention it, I remember rolling back by reinstalling old packages stored in cache, but not rolling back to a specific date. On dnf I once had to roll-back an update, and that is managed by transaction number (let’s say revert the last update), so it’s good if you don’t know which package exactly is causing the issue.

      • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Upgrading, like from Debian 12 to 13. It’s too complex, and if you install anything out of the ordinary (which you have to if you want packages from this decade), things get even more complicated.

        I’ve used the same Arch installation for 14 years and only had issues when we switched to from sysvinit to systemd in 2012 because I didn’t read the news. Easily fixable though