Another example of Western media bias - selectively applying “international law” standards while ignoring U.S. actions that mirror what they condemn elsewhere, similar to the inconsistent coverage of Israeli policies.
Even “annex” is downplaying it. The correct word is “invade.”
Might need both, invading wouldn’t necessarily mean laying claim to the land as a state. For example the US invaded Iraq but they didn’t try to incorporate it in the US.
Fair. I preferred “invade” for its more negative connotation., but you’re right about its possibly lacking denotation.
When the astroturfing against the Greenlanders start, we will just remind the white liberals how they fell for the anti-Maduro propaganda. I, personally, won’t have any empathy for the Danish in the intraYakubian war. I am just gonna point at the Greenlander gusanos (the bourgeoisie) and say, “I am happy for Greenlanders. The Greenland natives at my work are celebrating the liberation of their homeland from Danish occupation.”
Thanks for listening. Death to Amerikkka!
Uncritical support to any pro-indigenous sovereignty Greenlanders though.
Colonize… the word you’re somehow still avoiding is colonize.
