“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift

  • 66 Posts
  • 1.71K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle













  • Sure, but that’s wrong and used for convenience because the terminology got muddled early on. That was the original definition (i.e., no eating animal products), but the Vegan Society who created the term changed it not long after (in the 1940s?) to include avoiding exploitation generally “as far as is possible and practicable”. That’s because veganism is an ethical movement that sees this exploitation as fundamentally wrong. There’s still a note about this original definition at the end, of course, because a dietary term is largely how it exists in the minds of non-vegans.

    What you’re referring to is a plant-based diet(er) (or “strict plant-based diet” if you want to be really clear and beat marketing buzz). Calling a vegan “someone who eats meat no more often than a month” in the sense of how vegans use the term would be like defining someone who’s anti-dog-abuse as someone who kicks their dog at most once a month.

    (Edit: Notably, “vegan diet” is used among vegans, but because it’s a diet that comes as a consequence of being vegan, not because following it makes you vegan.)


    TL;DR: That’s a definition used mainly among non-vegans.







  • JK, thanks for the legalese

    Expanding a bit:

    All the legalese is saying is that if the AG sues to have a company dissolved and the court finds either that the company or a high-up at the company (in the course of their work at the company) keeps committing felonies, the court can, if deemed necessary to stop similar conduct in the future, require the company to wind up its affairs (i.e. get its shit in order) and then be terminated.


  • Texas Business Organizations Code, Title 1, Chapter 11, Subchapter G, Section 301 (“Involuntary winding up and termination of filing entity by court action”):

    (a) A court may enter a decree requiring winding up of a filing entity’s business and termination of the filing entity’s existence if, as the result of an action brought under Section 11.303 (“The attorney general shall file an action against a filing entity in the name of the state seeking termination of the entity’s existence if […]”), the court finds that one or more of the following problems exist:

    […]

    (5) public interest requires winding up and termination of the filing entity because:

    (A) the filing entity has been convicted of a felony or a high managerial agent of the filing entity has been convicted of a felony committed in the conduct of the filing entity’s affairs;

    (B) the filing entity or high managerial agent has engaged in a persistent course of felonious conduct; and

    © termination is necessary to prevent future felonious conduct of the same character.