Don’t buy cutlery from the Backrooms

Consider: Lucifer

Iirc most the ReVanced devs left due to some kinda conflict with the dev spearheading it. Morphe is the work of several ex-ReV devs working together specifically to evade that one guy, and ReV’s update code is mostly being pulled from Morphe anyway because the devs that left were doing most of the work, so that one guy is copying them back into ReV.

But hey that’s just what 8ve heard from other Lemmings, idk much more than that. Just that any updates to ReV are basically just delayed-repackaged Morphe code anyway.

Quite likely. Many Linux distros aren’t visible because they hide their telemetry, and would be marked as ‘unknown’ - or they spoof Windows or Mac for compatibility reasons. It’d be impossible to get an accurate read on how many computers run Linux, but it’ll be higher than the number that report it.

If anything it hightlights that it’s a mostly a matter of grooming/health.

If your hair is healthy, well-kept and clean, plenty of styles will look good. The cut itself is less important. Unwashed, matted, and deep-fried by 3-in-1 ‘soaps’? Even a basic barber cut will look frizzy and unkempt.

Same for beards. A beard of any length looks good brushed with a coarse boar-brush, treated with beard balm, trimmed to shape. Left to grow put with no treatment, no brushing, no clipping? Any length looks haggard.

Healthy hair, healthy skin, natural lighting and a confident yet approachable demeaner do almost all the work for us.

If I saw this I would assume it was spam. Same as the mail I get about donating to presidents, US tax returns, car warranties etc. I get plenty of American spam already.

Also as a person with marketing experience, a first-time email from an previously-unknown address that has an attachment is definitely going straight to spam on most decent email providers. That’s why I sent follow-ups.

Yeah no normal person is carrying that much cash. Its either a trap or a crime.

The closest normal reason I can think of is a poorer person having to pay rent in cash to their underhanded landlord. Such a loss is devastating.

But the police probably aren’t getting it all back to them though, esp since theyd have to go in and ask (AFTER dropping it off), including explaining their carry amount. NZ cops aren’t as insane as US cops but they’re overstretched and these jobs aren’t a priority for them.

…so I’d rather look for contact info of some kind, but then we’re back to trap or crime.

When the 2nd amendment was written, only the first amendment even existed. That’s why it’s the 2nd.

Who told you that you aren’t allowed to exercise rights until you are so disempowered you couldn’t exercise them anyway? What do they gain from that?

360 no-scope on autistic people tbh

I have my written tone read as ‘angry’ (or sometimes, passionate) just because of my formal word choice. It’s angry if I’m pointing out something bad, and passionate if I’m sharing something good. Because it’s not just meaning, its also being compared to everybody else’s writing.

As it is, when people call my name, turns out if you say ‘yes?’ Or ‘what’s up?’ in a completely neutral tone (because I’m concentrating on my task, not my performance)… the default interpretation is ‘pissed’. So now that’s another area I have to mask for others, even while I’m trying to work.

It’s the same reason women talking like men seem like bitches. It’s not about what you actually say or how you say it, it’s being compared to how you’re expected to behave. If we expect men to be forthright, and women to be diplomatic, then forthright women are bitches and diplomatic men are delicate.

The Shrek 2 ‘fairy godmother’ cover of I Need a Hero is far more enjoyable than the original one imo.

Others that come to mind have already been listed here…

The whole point of the phrase is: When the poor have nothing left to eat, they will eat the rich.

It wasnt coined as a threat. It’s a warning. The poor are already starving, and there is a limit.

And the thing is that ‘rich’ is not an intrinsic property, it’s not genetic. When you eat the rich, everything they were hoarding - that which gave them the title ‘rich’ - becomes accessible. It doesn’t disappear from the system like an MMO inventory.

Only after the starving poor eat the rich, will there be a path to a possible future without starvation.

It’s starting to seem really strange that you’re being evasive. Not mentioning it in the OP, sure, it’s not the relevant part and you’re not obliged to share.

Writing long awkwardly worded sentences instead of answering a direct question of people trying to help you… several times?

Are you embarrassed by the game you’re trying to play?

But what would be the point? Nobody’s doing anything about the high-profile pedophiles we already know. And kids have a bunch of other more common needs that are being conveniently ignored. The maths ain’t mathing

Absolutely incredible. I’ll take two

Most of those ‘crimes’ were just… being too poor to pay their debts. Shipping off the poor made England look better.

The ‘criminals’ of Aus are, at least in this respect, my brothers.

Seeing people commenting a put ‘their’ and thought they were correct ‘the’. it’s their own personal teacher, not The Great Teacher of Legend, Whom We All Share

Ehh it depends how many religions they actually include. If they have several major world religions, they can educate on religious themes and cultural relevance etc.

You know, different from religious indoctrination where you’re just told about one religion and graded on your ability to regurgitate it, not comprehend it.

Yeah, that’s the eww part :( I hate when I find great memes and I know exactly the friend to share them to… and I can’t DM them.

Especially if it’s animated. Easy enough to change the extension on PC to a PNG without issue yet. But anything too large to screenshot, or with multiple frames? Many a DND meme have I let pass by

Morally nothing, but legally broadcast law and ERSB ratings are very strict. Like, ‘literally count the number of each cuss’ strict. Ratings aren’t determined by Dennis and Marjorie vibing it out, it’s concluded almost algorithmically based on literal, unambiguous features. Context has very little relevance to the ratings questionnaire.

Even if it is in the spirit of the ratings law, only the letter of the law is enforcable, regardless of context.

It’s probably a good thing for the arts overall, since ratings are so very impactful for reception/profit, I can’t imagine the lawsuits being flung if a studio accused Dennis or Marjorie of bias.

First thing I did was try to find us; I thought the same thing