- cross-posted to:
- technology@hexbear.net
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
- technology@piefed.social
- cross-posted to:
- technology@hexbear.net
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
- technology@piefed.social
You must log in or register to comment.
Alright, then copyright is dead.
Ad block and canceling subscriptions it is then.
Yarhar!
I’m downloading all of Netflix library to train my LLM.
Aaron Schwartz’s prosecution was always bullshit. RIP.
Peak capitalism, steal everything from the masses, remix and regurgitate it so no one is the wiser, then sell it back to them via a subscription model.
Makes me sick.
Rules for thee, not for me.
Pirating anything isn’t illegal anymore. If the government can pick and choose people and groups who don’t have to pay for patent or copyright, then there are no patents or copyrights.
To clarify, this is the government’s position, not the law. This hasn’t been officially ruled on yet.
In a lawsuit that The New York Times filed against OpenAI, the Trump administration has contributed a 20-page brief in defense of the ChatGPT maker’s unlicensed use of copyrighted material to train its LLMs.
However, it’s not looking promising in legal terms either.
Pirating was illegal? When?
This just in… I think I’m going to start training my own LLM on various movies, TV shows, and music. US government said it was ok.
Kleptocracy.
Rules for thee and not for me.
Really cool how the supreme court doesnt give a shit about the law anymore and like half their rulings are “ik the law says we cant do this, but that would be really inconvenient so it doesnt matter”
So… Let’s steal to advance our country. Really nice.
Well copyrights either apply to all or to none. We aren’t going to make exceptions for someone’s favourite companies.
Whithouse: which opinion will piss off the most Americans?
So… pay for it? It’s not like the money isn’t there
Actually, is not
True. Profit is about the only thing these companies will never generate, but there’s still money being thrown at them, it’s just being spent on bonuses, mergers, and data centers.
Scrapers could peel off 1B of that to pay for what they’re taking (like the pay for antique, print only books—because they can’t physically steal those) instead of just robbing the commons if they really wanted to, if they thought that anything they were doing was ethically defensible or financially sustainable. ___
It is crazy music samples have stronger laws for commercial usage than AI.
I am okay with that. As long we are consistent with the copyright law. If OpenAI can break copyright to make their own money, it should be legal to me too.
Laws should be the same for everyone and no one should be above the law
I also imagine a world without copyright may not be any worse than the one we’re in. In a lot of ways it would probably be much better.
