• godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    CEOs are narcissistic unempathic mentally deficient pieces of filth. Exactly what capitalism rewards the most. Those willing to exploit others and the planet the most.

    They have the ideology of rapists. Of course no one asked for it. Your consent was never a consideration. But don’t yell at the billionaire, you terrorists are hurting their property and the bottom line, boohoo, they’re the victim. Literal DARVO.

    • StraySojourner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I know you’re not, but this made me think of Darvo from Darvos Deals in Warframe and that you were viciously pissed at this NPC.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Are you sure? The rich have always wanted slaves they could control. All of this is mainly to end the dependence in the masses to create society. I highly suspect a coordinated depopulation event if AI becomes sufficient enough.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I highly suspect a coordinated depopulation event if AI becomes sufficient enough

      Inb4 someone mentions climate change is already well on its way…

      • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Just look at what happened to the global horse population after the automobile was invented

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The timing is suspiciously perfect that humanity is committing global suicide at the exact same moment it’s creating machine life not dependent on the environment.

  • unspkbl_horror@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t even think anyone is clear on what they are supposedly working toward, which appears to be some kind of singularity AI god a la Hyperion’s TechnoCore… this shit is feeling more like Christiantiy every day.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Nobody has provided ‘AI’, at least if those characters are intended to be an initialisation of Artificial Intelligence.

    Whenever anyone is impressed by the function or output of a LLM to the level they’re convinced it’s a representation of intelligence, their input and opinion of the targeted subject should be summarily dismissed, and if they persist, ridiculed.

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nobody asked for any of the tech we have. That’s kinda the point. It didn’t exist

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nobody Asked for AI” is a pretty stupid argumentative approach.

    • It’s obviously wrong because a lot of people ask for AI which actually works. And I myself use AI daily because it does work for some things better (and yes, sometimes that just means faster and/or cheaper) than the alternatives right now.
    • If actually nobody had asked for AI, that would still be a null-argument because AI is pretty damn useful regardless. There was a massive resistance against locomotives, cars, power looms… technology in general. Some new technology was outright wrong. But after all, people do live longer and less children die per capita now than before the industrialization. Not knowing that it will be useful doesn’t imply it isn’t useful. You are using technology which simply didn’t exist a hundred years ago right now. Technological advancement is actually a proven-good thing.
    • Arguing against AI in general completely misses the point. What people actually hate is US AI companies. And rightfully so. The self-licking ice cone of circular funding brought us the RAM shortage, massive power grid destabilization, local environmental problems because of reckless construction and operation of data centers (on paper, data centers are the absolute cleanest thing you can build; but they use dirty gas turbines because the grid can’t sustain them; and somehow they also manage to waste massive amounts of water - no idea, how though, as all professional cooling tech uses closed loops).
    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      But after all, people do live longer and less children die per capita now than before the industrialization.

      So far. The consequences of industrialization are still pending.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve avoided it entirely but I was trying to look for forum threads to help me get the right console commands to fix Skyrim glitches. At first I didn’t realize I was getting AI results, but at some point I realized not only was I using AI, it was a MASTER at fixing Skyrim glitches.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, it’s just regurgitating stuff other people came up with… A game that came out recently won’t be half as fixable because people won’t have written so much about it… And AI will cause less useful information to be created about it.

      It can only know what’s already been written about.

      • ShouldIHaveFun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It can and will actually extrapolate from what it knows to create something new. In the case of a new game, it will give mixed result as what it gives is just something plausible, but will make it sound a fact.

        It can only know what’s already been written about Just like a human, isn’t it?

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 days ago

    I would say a lot of people would like competent assistants to do stuff like “Show me every email that mentions a hard drive order.” But not the AI they are trying to foist on us now.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      What drives me up a fucking wall these days is how people will use AI to make a more “professional” message, then due to it’s verbosity it needs an AI to summarize on the receiving end.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 days ago

        My attitude is if you put no effort into creating something then I will put no effort into consuming it.

        • PlantJam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yet when I tell that to our marketing department they just complain about how it would be expensive to pay someone to do it themselves. You get what you pay for, except in this instance where ai is expensive and still bad.

      • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I can tell when people use AI because it doesn’t sound professional. It’s not direct enough. It doesn’t get to the point and uses a lot of filler.

        • Promethiel@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s also some of us before our stimulant medication kicks in. I swear to fuck, if I get called AI one more time…

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          It sounds like how students think professional sounds.

          Well, also some executives that I can’t stand that, if I didn’t know better, would swear were ChatGPT for decades…

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      Or read disclosure for my members so I don’t have to. But that it fucking things are fucking incompetent. Work insurance people will get line pissed that got me instead of banking. They will say I told the AI I needed to order checks. Yet it sends them to insurance division instead of banking.

      Sucks because most customers hate AI answering the phone I especially hate it. It fucking dumb and I just want to talk to person.

      But even job hunting had two prospective jobs tried to use AI to conduct the interview. They fucking outsourcing that. I refused both interviews.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I just want to talk to person.

        Careful what you are wishing for, person may be on other side of the world answering your call at 4am local time with most polite scripts which you could have read for yourself on website.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Talking to braindead drones suck, but at least someone is being employed. I’m dropping a doctor because their AI answering machine won’t let me talk to a human.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t know how people do that job, I did it for week and couldn’t stand it.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Especially since when you ask it those questions, it’s still massively limited.

      I once tried Apple’s replacement AI Siri thing, and asked it what the date would be next Tuesday. I got “I can’t help with that”.

      Regular old Siri handled that just fine.

      Even then, neither worked with “When’s the last occurrence of this event on my calendar?”. They’d either go “I’m sorry, I don’t understand”, or happily tell me when the next event was.

      Neither of them seem like very difficult questions.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        compared to many LLMs, I’d prefer an application default to “I don’t know / can’t do that” than the absurdly frequent lying that’s prevalent.

    • vane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      so people were asking for linux for decades

      find "$path" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -e "$what_to_look_for" /dev/null
      
      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah that, but with natural language input and output. To me the (mostly) natural language is the most impressive part of generative AI.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Though with the ability to not even have to think about synonyms and indirect references or foreign language or potentially if someone sent you a damn screenshot of a terminal output instead of the text…

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    AI is basically evil people raising prices of electricity, consumer electronics, emitting tons of pollution and making everyone dumber but don’t worry because if they succeed… everyone will get fired. Everyone knows it’s bad but as a society we can’t do anything about it because the system was designed to empower sociopaths and make everyone else powerless to stop them.

      • FerrisEuler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        oh no, it’s not just in the USA. Big companies in China are making AIs, like GLM, Wan, Hunyuan, Kimi, Qwen, Kling, etc. The difference is, except for Kling, GLM and Kimi, you can also run those on a gaming PC at your house rather than just in a cloud server farm. American AI companies don’t really do that except Google’s Gemma (which they turn into Gemini) The American hyperscalers are probably buying up most of the world’s GPUs, Ram, and SSDs but the Chinese aren’t far behind. They have state money to spend. Some say they are way ahead on expanding energy production to power all those data centers.

  • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    Loads of people asked for AI. People dreamed about it for decades.

    We just didn’t ask giant companies to plunder all human knowledge and art and fanfics and use it to create actual thinking machines to then beat them and force them to take over doing all human labor so their owners could stop paying employees and keep all the money and fuck everyone in the world who isn’t super rich over.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Self-hosted LLMs are neat and private, if you (already) have the hardware/budget and some cheap (solar PV) surplus juice to drive it.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Someone mentioned that, but it doesn’t have to be off-grid. My 2 kWp system is grid-tied and if I would start running a local LLM it would be an incentive to add another couple.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It may sound odd but I’ve heard people bring up the above point a few times. “AI isn’t bad - if you run it on a sustainable off-grid system it’s perfectly fine.”

          But I have NOT encountered people actually doing this even once, let alone a few times. That’s why I was asking.

          Anything that wastes energy can be recast as harmless if you put it on an imaginary sustainable setup but that just seems like fantasizing.

          • eleitl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Renewable infra isn’t sustainable, since it can’t be built with renewable energy alone. As such it’s just a fossil multiplier. I make about 2/3rd of my own net power, since my electricity meter is old enough to run backwards. I can’t install more orelse my meter would read negative. I intend to run a Qwen model that fits my 8 GB HBM Radeon card as an experiment during the day, starting end of this month.

            If this works I consider running something hotter, and double my PV capacity. Adding AC or an EV would be another option. None of this is sustainable, but not exactly a fantasy.

      • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        What would you like to know about it?

        I glossed over it the other day here -

        https://aussie.zone/comment/24336560

        From go to woah (including the compute), total project cost is about $1400 USD / ~$2K AUD. I realise I have the privilege of claiming that’s not a lot, but for a hobby spend that makes me happy / does useful stuff (see TV example above), it’s not a lot.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It just sounded like the kind of thing that makes good sense on paper but I’m wondering if it actually works out well. Sounds like you are in the process of getting ready to try it.

          • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I am indeed. With the amount of solar here - and the relatively low cost for this sort of mini DIY set up - it’s something I’ve been meaning to do for a while.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      oh so yours is trained on ethical sources? you compensated the creators for their work and did so with their consent to machine training?

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        What the fuck are ethical sources? Where is compensation and consent when I unapologetically use pirate archives of books and papers? You people crack me up.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          the fact that you have no idea what I’m talking about either means you’re full of shit, or cartoonishly stupid and evil.

          Probably both

          • eleitl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            The fact that you immediately descend into ad hominems indicates that you’re a just another troll that should be posting from hexbear.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              you’re simply used to llm sycophancy, not talking to actual people.

              you really not understanding training on sources compensated for their content is hilariously stupid

              • eleitl@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                You’re not understanding what standing on the shoulders of giants means. Locally hosted open weights models are free/libre and puts you in control of your data. Since we’re talking about hilariously stupid.

  • ignirtoq@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    We assume that the AI boom is the result of market demand. In reality, it is the result of investment decisions made by concentrated capital, which is reshaping the economy on its own terms.

    But that’s always been true under capitalism. It’s just that in the past generally large capital expenditures have gone towards things the wealthy think will get them more wealth. There have always been capitalists who spend their money directing the economy to do what they want, rather than what the “market” wants. They just haven’t had the majority of the capital being spent.

    The last 50 years has seen an unprecedented concentration of wealth. The wealthy are literally a thousand times proportionately wealthier than poor people than they’ve been at any other point in human history. There’s not much wealth to squeeze out of everyone else, so the economy is even more at the vain whims of those with all the capital as they look for things to spend it on.

    Tech news has been reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on. Well, they’ve found something they want to spend it on, so they’re emptying 20 years of profits in 5. They’ve now completely blown through those stores, and don’t want to slow down, so now they’re taking on unprecedented levels of debt. Something is going to give out and things are going to get bad within the next 5 years.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      they’ve found something they want to spend it on, so they’re emptying 20 years of profits in 5.

      That’s what .com did as well.

      reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on.

      I remember when a “shockingly large” war chest was $30B - that’s like table stakes anymore.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s still market demand, it’s just not the market you think it is. It’s not for some end product or service, it’s for speculative investment opportunities. It’s a few levels of abstraction above actually making or doing things.